Verbatim from the venue. The analyst must quote these, never paraphrase.
If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028. A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes. A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No. If the case is dismissed, found improvidently granted, or remanded without resolving the granted question on the merits, the market resolves to No.
early_close_conditionThis market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
Yes bid (no ask)
Size
Yes
Time
Yes
No
Size
Taker
2mo ago
73¢
27¢
0.12
no
2mo ago
81¢
19¢
0.12
yes
event_ticker
KXSCOTUSCASE-APPEPI28
exchange_index0
expected_expiration_time2028-08-01T14:00:00Z
expiration_time2028-08-01T14:00:00Z
expiration_value
last_price_dollars0.7300
latest_expiration_time2028-08-01T14:00:00Z
liquidity_dollars0.0000
market_typebinary
no_ask_dollars0.2800
no_bid_dollars0.1800
no_sub_titleBefore Aug 1, 2028
notional_value_dollars1.0000
occurrence_datetime2028-08-01T14:00:00Z
open_interest_fp0.00
open_time2026-07-23T14:00:00Z
previous_price_dollars0.7300
previous_yes_ask_dollars0.9800
previous_yes_bid_dollars0.0000
price_level_structurelinear_cent
price_ranges1
[0]3
end1.0000
start0.0000
step0.0100
result
rules_primaryIf the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.
rules_secondaryThe Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028. A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes. A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No. If the case is dismissed, found improvidently granted, or remanded without resolving the granted question on the merits, the market resolves to No.
settlement_timer_seconds1800
statusactive
tickerKXSCOTUSCASE-APPEPI28
titleWill the Supreme Court rule in favor of Apple Inc. in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc.