Verbatim from the venue. The analyst must quote these, never paraphrase.
If the Supreme Court, in Salazar v. Paramount Global, rules the VPPA’s definition of “consumer” includes subscribers to any goods or services from a video tape service provider, not only its audiovisual goods or services, then the market resolves to Yes.
The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled, in Salazar v. Paramount Global, that the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider” in the Video Privacy Protection Act’s definition of “consumer” refers to all of that provider’s goods or services and is not limited to its audiovisual goods or services, after Issuance and before August 1, 2028. A ruling that the phrase covers only audiovisual goods or services resolves to No. If the case is dismissed, found improvidently granted, or remanded without resolving this interpretive question on the merits, the market resolves to No; a remand accompanying the qualifying merits holding resolves to Yes.
early_close_conditionThis market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
ask11872¢
ask21071¢
ask5070¢
ask20045¢
spread10¢mid 40¢
bid20035¢
bid2477¢
bid4186¢
bid53¢
bid501¢
Yes bid (no ask)SizeYes
Time
Yes
No
Size
Taker
4d ago
37¢
63¢
4.36
no
2mo ago
44¢
56¢
4.36
yes
event_ticker
KXSCOTUSCASE-SALPAR28
exchange_index0
expected_expiration_time2028-08-01T14:00:00Z
expiration_time2028-08-01T14:00:00Z
expiration_value
last_price_dollars0.3700
latest_expiration_time2028-08-01T14:00:00Z
liquidity_dollars0.0000
market_typebinary
no_ask_dollars0.6500
no_bid_dollars0.5500
no_sub_titleBefore Aug 1, 2028
notional_value_dollars1.0000
occurrence_datetime2028-08-01T14:00:00Z
open_interest_fp4.36
open_time2026-07-24T00:00:00Z
previous_price_dollars0.3700
previous_yes_ask_dollars0.9800
previous_yes_bid_dollars0.3700
price_level_structurelinear_cent
price_ranges1
[0]3
end1.0000
start0.0000
step0.0100
result
rules_primaryIf the Supreme Court, in Salazar v. Paramount Global, rules the VPPA’s definition of “consumer” includes subscribers to any goods or services from a video tape service provider, not only its audiovisual goods or services, then the market resolves to Yes.
rules_secondaryThe Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled, in Salazar v. Paramount Global, that the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider” in the Video Privacy Protection Act’s definition of “consumer” refers to all of that provider’s goods or services and is not limited to its audiovisual goods or services, after Issuance and before August 1, 2028. A ruling that the phrase covers only audiovisual goods or services resolves to No. If the case is dismissed, found improvidently granted, or remanded without resolving this interpretive question on the merits, the market resolves to No; a remand accompanying the qualifying merits holding resolves to Yes.
settlement_timer_seconds1800
statusactive
tickerKXSCOTUSCASE-SALPAR28
titleWill the Supreme Court rule in favor of Michael Salazar in Salazar v. Paramount Global