Supreme Court decisions·closes in 23mo

Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Apple Inc. in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc.

YES means Before Aug 1, 2028

24h volume
0
0.24 lifetime
Open interest
0
Spread
10¢
200 × 200 at the touch
24h range
2 recent trades
Chance of YES
73%

A YES contract costs 82¢ and pays $1 if it happens.

NO
27%

costs 28¢

YES bid / ask
72¢ / 82¢
NO bid / ask
18¢ / 28¢
Recent buying50% YES · 50% NO
What Galdor thinks

An independent read of this market

1Reads the rules literallySettlement source, close time, and the edge cases that flip an outcome.
2Checks the tape and the webOrder book, flow, price history, then targeted searches with sources.
3Gives a straight answerA probability with a band, and one of four calls: YES, NO, wait, or stay out.

Generated by an AI analyst from live exchange data and public web sources. Research and analytics, not investment advice. Markets can move after this was written.

Price history

YES price per candle with the bid/ask band, volume underneath. Times in UTC.

Not enough history to chart.

Order book

Resting orders, both sides shown as YES prices. Bars are size.

Yes ask (no bid)SizeYes
  • ask14098¢
  • ask20082¢
spread10¢mid 77¢
  • bid20072¢
Yes bid (no ask)SizeYes

How this market resolves

Verbatim from Kalshi. Read this before the price.

If the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc., rules civil contempt may not be based on violating an injunction’s “spirit” when the injunction does not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the precise conduct at issue, then the market resolves to Yes.

The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court, in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc., has ruled that a party may be held in civil contempt only for violating an injunction that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, and not merely for violating the injunction’s “spirit” where the injunction is silent as to that conduct, before August 1, 2028. A decision adopting that legal standard and remanding for its application resolves to Yes. A decision permitting civil contempt based on the injunction’s “spirit” despite such silence resolves to No. If the case is dismissed, found improvidently granted, or remanded without resolving the granted question on the merits, the market resolves to No.

Settlement sources
opened
Jul 23 · 2:00 PM UTC
closes
Aug 1, 2028 · 2:00 PM UTC · may close early
settles by
Aug 1, 2028 · 2:00 PM UTC
ticker
KXSCOTUSCASE-APPEPI28
Trade it on kalshi.com

This event

Outcomes in this event settle independently.

This is the only market in Will SCOTUS bar contempt for conduct not clearly prohibited by an injunction?.

Recent trades

Over the last 2 trades, 50% of contracts were bought on the YES side.

WhenYESContractsSide
2mo ago73¢0.12bought no
2mo ago81¢0.12bought yes

Prices are YES cost in cents and approximate the market’s implied probability. Data is read live from the Kalshi Trade API on every page load. galdor.xyz places no orders and holds no positions. Research and analytics, not investment advice.