Supreme Court decisions·closes in 23mo

Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of St. Mary Catholic Parish in Littleton in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy

YES means Before Aug 1, 2028

24h volume
0
617 lifetime
Open interest
214
+0 over 24h
Spread
5 × 0.19 at the touch
24h range
12 recent trades
Chance of YES
73%

A YES contract costs 81¢ and pays $1 if it happens.

NO
27%

costs 27¢

YES bid / ask
73¢ / 81¢
NO bid / ask
19¢ / 27¢
Recent buying67% YES · 33% NO
What Galdor thinks

An independent read of this market

1Reads the rules literallySettlement source, close time, and the edge cases that flip an outcome.
2Checks the tape and the webOrder book, flow, price history, then targeted searches with sources.
3Gives a straight answerA probability with a band, and one of four calls: YES, NO, wait, or stay out.

Generated by an AI analyst from live exchange data and public web sources. Research and analytics, not investment advice. Markets can move after this was written.

Price history

YES price per candle with the bid/ask band, volume underneath. Times in UTC.

Not enough history to chart.

Order book

Resting orders, both sides shown as YES prices. Bars are size.

Yes ask (no bid)SizeYes
  • ask80398¢
  • ask21496¢
  • ask10995¢
  • ask5094¢
  • ask4793¢
  • ask1189¢
  • ask20082¢
  • ask0.1981¢
spreadmid 77¢
  • bid573¢
  • bid20072¢
  • bid25412¢
  • bid86511¢
  • bid50
Yes bid (no ask)SizeYes

How this market resolves

Verbatim from Kalshi. Read this before the price.

If the Supreme Court, in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, rules either that establishing a lack of general applicability under Employment Division v. Smith does not require unfettered discretion or categorical exemptions for identical secular conduct, or that Carson v. Makin can displace Smith without an explicit exclusion of religious people or institutions, then the market resolves to Yes.

The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled, in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, either that proving a lack of general applicability under Employment Division v. Smith does not require unfettered discretion or categorical exemptions for identical secular conduct, or that Carson v. Makin may displace Smith even when the government has not explicitly excluded religious people or institutions, after Issuance and before August 1, 2028. A merits ruling establishing either proposition is sufficient, even if the Court does not reach the other question. The market resolves to No if the Court establishes neither proposition, or if the case is dismissed, settled, DIG’d, or remanded without a merits ruling establishing either proposition.

Settlement sources
opened
Jul 23 · 2:00 PM UTC
closes
Aug 1, 2028 · 2:00 PM UTC · may close early
settles by
Aug 1, 2028 · 2:00 PM UTC
ticker
KXSCOTUSCASE-STMROY28
Trade it on kalshi.com

This event

Outcomes in this event settle independently.

This is the only market in Will SCOTUS reject narrow Free Exercise tests for Catholic preschools?.

Recent trades

Over the last 12 trades, 67% of contracts were bought on the YES side.

WhenYESContractsSide
1mo ago74¢4.88bought no
1mo ago73¢195bought no
1mo ago75¢0.19bought no
1mo ago79¢1bought yes
1mo ago24¢1bought no
2mo ago80¢1bought yes
2mo ago75¢0.12bought no
2mo ago81¢0.12bought yes
2mo ago68¢200bought yes
2mo ago67¢5bought yes
2mo ago84¢8.85bought yes
2mo ago64¢200bought yes

Prices are YES cost in cents and approximate the market’s implied probability. Data is read live from the Kalshi Trade API on every page load. galdor.xyz places no orders and holds no positions. Research and analytics, not investment advice.